Tuesday, 28 April 2020

The Story of You


I love stories. We all do. I bet a lot of your extra time now is listening, reading or viewing other people's stories. There's something that stories stir within us. They invite us to be the best version of ourselves, to rise up, rise above, be a part of the good that conquers evil. Good stories make us laugh, cry, think. Great stories speak to the soul.



7 Classic Story Types

At the heart of stories are character. When you're creating a story, you need a good main character. Someone plucky, pithy and just a little bit pathetic. They need to have a fault or two so people can relate to them, and there's nothing quite as irresistible as an underdog to cheer on.

I think about some characters that I adore - David Copperfield from A Personal History of David Copperfield to Jamil Malik from Slumdog Millionaire, Jo March from Little Women to Bilbo Baggins from the Hobbit, Iron Man from the Avengers to Elizabeth in Pride and Prejudice, Simba in the Lion King, to that blue-faced guy in Braveheart. We adore them, we resonate with them, we see ourselves in them; they inspire the best in us.

Do you know what all of these characters have in common?

None of these stories happened while the characters stayed at home and did nothing. Even Elizabeth went to other people's houses and lounged about for parts of her story. Stories are limited when you have to stay inside. I feel your current pain. Presently, our individual stories are paused. We are limited to being passive spectators of a much bigger part of history unfolding rather than people with agency in our own lives, but only for a little while. We are part of a much larger story of how the world will get through this particular crisis, but that's another subject for another time.

One of the most compelling books I've ever read is called A Million Miles in a Thousand Years by Donald Miller. This book made me dramatically rethink how I view my role in my life, in my story.

Having written his memoirs about how he grappled with his fatherless childhood, he is approached to help turn his book into a movie. Screenwriting is very different from novel writing, and there is a much greater focus on story arcs, character development and action. This book follows the author as he learns about the necessary elements of storytelling, and how he applied that to his personal life during the process of creating the screen play.

I would like to share with you lessons I learned about writing the story of your life from Donald Miller.


1. Your Character Has To Want Something


“The ambitions we have will become the stories we live. If you want to know what a person’s story is about, just ask them what they want. If we don’t want anything, we are living boring stories, and if we want a Roomba vaccum cleaner, we are living stupid stories. If it won’t work in a story, it won’t work in life.”

Classically, in stories, characters need to want something. They need to want it badly enough that they're willing to persevere through some pretty horrific experiences, and still pursue their object of desire. The more the character wants the thing, the better the story is. The more obstacles they overcome, the better a story it becomes.

We all know Frodo Baggins and his quest to get the One Ring to Mordor and destroy it, right? He wanted to be rid of that thing so badly. He had to finish; giving up wasn't an option. He sacrificed everything to get it there. It was tremendously difficult, and he had lots of conflicts and obstacles along the way.

That story is loved the world over, not because some piece of metal made it to the volcano, but because it represents the triumph over Ringwraiths, Balroks, Trolls, cold, battles, possessed people, all over the forces of evil, and the trickery of Smeagol/Gollum, and ultimately over themselves as they transform from scared little Hobbits to brave warriors. The wanting to complete the quest is greater than any of the obstacles that stands in their way. As Frodo and Sam succeed, good triumphs over evil, and our faith in the world is restored.


Sometimes you can be part of a great adventure without wanting to. Sometimes you want to and don't really know where to start.

Sometimes you're busy wanting a Roomba, to get your roots died, and a manicure.

What do you want?

Is it worthy of being wanted?

Nothing wrong with Roombas, but if that's your highest ambition, take a look around. Evil is on the brink of triumphing over good around basically every corner, and you're waxing lyrical over a Roomba?

What do you really want?


I must confess I'm at the stage of my story where I have everything I thought I wanted, and now I need to think about what's next. I don't have the answers just yet, but they're slowly formulating. My problem is I have too many competing wants - environmentalism, teaching, coding, travelling, a social life. Can I have all of those? Watch this space.

2. Problems are Necessary


“A character who wants something and overcomes conflict to get it 
is the basic structure of a good story.”

When you're writing a story, there has to be a problem or a conflict. Whilst contentedness is a good thing to aim for in life, alas that is not where the story is. So if all you're aiming for is contentedness and the path of least resistance, then that's likely to make a pretty boring life story.

“The principle that characters do not want to change applies to more than just fiction.”

Change is a fact of life, right? But we usually despise and avoid change. We cling to sameness and routine in order to maintain some kind of homeostasis. The problem with this is nothing is static, and we, like water, if we're still for too long, grow stagnant. 

In storytelling, the bigger the problem, the better the story. Characters are flung outside of their comfort zone through choices they, or others, have made. 

“The inciting incident is how you get characters to do something. It's the doorway through which they can't return, you know. The story takes care of the rest.”


When I read the Hobbit, I was always taken aback by how reticent Bilbo was to go on an adventure. I thought it was really strange that you would not be curious, or excited, to go and see what was beyond the edges of the Shire. Adventures looked fun and glamorous, full of excitement and novelty!

I think now that I have seen what is beyond the edges of my Shire, I can understand his reticence. There are problems out there, and when you're in the thick of it, it is deeply uncomfortable facing them. Watching someone else's story doesn't prepare you for the chaffing between your thighs when you've walked all day, or for the gut-wrenching fear of the unknown, for the confusion of not being able to find the new place you need to find, or the exhaustion that all this adventure comes with. There is no mute, pause or power off. There is no escape, tea breaks or return any time soon.



In fact, there's usually more than one problem in order to make a good story. And the problems get bigger as you go on, until you reach the climax, everything comes to a head and it is do or die.

This is usually when your character has to make a choice. Take the easy way out, or fight?

Why is all of this conflict necessary?

“Writing a story isn’t about making your peaceful fantasies come true. The whole point of the story is the character arc. You didn’t think joy could change a person, did you? Joy is what you feel when the conflict is over. But it’s conflict that changes a person.” His voice was like thunder now. “You put your characters through hell. You put them through hell. That’s the only way we change.”

There is something about humans that really appreciates - in hindsight at least - the conflicts and the problems. In the same way a caterpillar has to transform in order to become a butterfly, we also need some sort of chrysalis, some sort of problem, to metamorphose into the next version of ourselves. In the same way Riley (in Inside Out) has to feel sadness in order to express her feelings, resolve a conflict and get back to being her joyful self, we too have to go through tricky seasons, conflicts and troubles. Knowing they serve a purpose can help.

“Life no longer felt meaningless. It felt stressful and terrifying, but it definitely didn't feel meaningless.”



Your conflicts could range from 'where are my keys' to 'what am I even doing here?', but life is full of them. How you react to them can make or break your story. As Brené Brown says 'lean into the discomfort' and see what the conflict is trying to teach you. 

A source of conflict in our story of living in Ireland has been my professional quandary, and the resulting drop in salary. Does that mean I should give up on pivoting my career and immediately go back to teaching? No, I don't think so. There's a new chapter ahead, I just haven't fully figured out what it is yet, and at the moment, I feel like I'd be short changing my story if I didn't at least entertain alternatives. 

3. The Greater the Stakes, the Greater the Story


“If you watched a movie about a guy who wanted a Volvo and worked for years to get it, you wouldn’t cry at the end when he drove off the lot, testing the windshield wipers. 
You wouldn’t tell your friends you saw a beautiful movie or go home and 
put a record on to think about the story you’d seen. 
The truth is, you wouldn't remember that movie a week later, 
except you’d feel robbed and want your money back. 
Nobody cries at the end of a movie about a guy who wants a Volvo.

But we spend years actually living those stories, and expect our lives to be meaningful. 
The truth is, if what we choose to do with our lives won't make a story meaningful, 
it won’t make a life meaningful either”

I think this is true - to a certain degree. You can have entertaining or ridiculous stories about wanting a Volvo. One of the purest examples of this is the movie Bad Teacher, where the main character really wants a boob job, and is willing to do anything to get it. Comedies are full of people who want ridiculous things, but are willing to go above and beyond to get them.

However, if an epic, meaningful life is what you're after, then you need to be aiming for epic, meaningful things.

I think there is something within each of us that yearns to be part of something more meaningful than just ourselves and our flaccid desires.

So I guess this is the part where you decide if you're in a comedy or an epic saga - remembering that some of life's greatest lessons can be learned through silliness, and even epic sagas have their comic relief.


4. The Higher the Risk, the Higher the Reward.


“[He] said he didn't think we should be afraid to embrace whimsy. 
I asked him what he meant by whimsy, and he struggled to define it. 
He said it's that nagging idea that life could be magical; 
it could be special if we were only willing to take a few risks.”

One salient lesson was maximum risk for maximum reward. I mean there's a fine line between bravery and stupidity, right? But in order to be creating a good story, you do need to be walking that line. There needs to be something at stake. This is not like investment advice where you only invest what you're willing to lose. This is you all in, boots and all, usually risking life and limb because your desire to attain the thing or complete the quest is bigger than your self-preservation.

In this book, Don had been pussyfooting around trying to get this girl to go out with him, and eventually took up cycling and spent 40 days cycling across America so he could spend time with her. They went on a few dates. It didn't work out, but he took a risk. He also met another girl along the way. They went on a few dates. That didn't work out either. But now he was getting better at taking risks, and willing to give something of himself to make his story worthwhile.



If you're stuck in your tiny same-samey life, then it'll be a case of 'if you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always gotten. And that's the stagnant thing we spoke of before.

The difference between you and carefully crafted stories on the silver screen is you don't know how many false starts and re-writes they had to do to get that version that you are watching. It will be risky, it will be messy, it might suck a little, but do it anyway!



Go out on a limb - that's where the fruit is, right?


Ok I'm done with platitudes for now.

This leads into another magnificent byproduct. When you are developing your own story, it is magnetic, and you will attract others who are also developing theirs. You will not have time for drama, because you know what you want and you're too busy trying to get it so you don't have time to be a bit-part in someone else's story, or worse - an antagonist.

We came to Ireland with nothing, the clothes in our suitcase, a trusty game of The Great Dalmuti and barely enough money to get an apartment. We knew no one, we knew nothing about the place, but we knew that if we could survive the first year, then we'd probably be OK. The first year was up on Feb 16 2020. Schools in Ireland were shut down from the pandemic on March 13, and we've both been home since then.

Our current hurdle is a big one, and it does beg the question of whether or not we will rewrite the story. So far, we're still OK. We both have jobs, and having piked early from Laos and having still a little bit of residual FOMO around that, I'm keen to stick it out here and see Europe - even if we have to wait until next year.

5. There Needs To Be a Character Arc


“If the point of life is the same as the point of a story, the point of life is character transformation. 
If I got any comfort as I set out on my first story, it was that in nearly every story, 
the protagonist is transformed. 
He's a jerk at the beginning and nice at the end, or a coward at the beginning and brave at the end. 
If the character doesn't change, the story hasn't happened yet. 
And if story is derived from real life, 
if story is just condensed version of life then 
life itself may be designed to change us so that 
we evolve from one kind of person to another. ”


Whether your story is more like a TV series, full of lots of little lessons and character iterations, or yours is more like a novel-level major character overhaul, your life will have a character arc. (Beware: The antagonist also has a character arc.) Some people's story leads them away from being nice guys to being assholes.

The beauty of knowing this is that you get to choose which kind of character you want to be, because instead of just getting wiped out in the tsunami of life, you now have a surfboard of knowledge, and can go hang 10, baby.

If you let it happen to you, then you become the victim of your story, this is usually where we get into the realm of the tragedy. The tragic characters that could never quite get out of their own way, and are doomed to their bit part in their own story.

Othello is caught in a web of deceit by Iago about his wife having an affair, and jumps to conclusions rather than actually talking about the problem, and ends up murdering his darling.

Ty in the Almighty Johnsons is secretly the Norse God Hod, god of all things dark and cold, and accidentally gives the woman of his dreams hypothermia when sleeping next to her. He then takes charge and dies to relinquish himself of his Hod personification, and is brought back to life, but then his lover has forgotten who he is. (If you haven't yet watched the Almighty Johnsons then it's on TVNZ on demand, and that is a conflict in your story that should definitely be resolved.)

While it is heart breaking to watch, it is even more heart breaking to be that character. Generally, if there is tragedy in our lives, it only for a time, unless we are the authors of our own demise.



As a teen, I watched in horror as my parents' marriage imploded. A small silver lining from that is that I then spent my 20s reading every book and listening to every piece of advice I could about how to avoid having my marriage do the same. 5 years with Jared, and nearly 3 years married it's really too soon to say, but the story is looking like a happy ending so far.

6. The Main Character Has to Make Some Choices


“I've wondered, though, if one of the reasons we fail to acknowledge 
the brilliance of life is because we don't want 
the responsibility inherent in the acknowledgement. 
We don't want to be characters in a story because 
characters have to move and breathe and face conflict with courage. 
And if life isn't remarkable, then we don't have to do any of that; 
we can be unwilling victims instead of grateful participants.”

If we are simply existing, with little thought or intention about who we are and where we are going, and what we are doing with this beautiful gift of life, then what is the point? To simply be an audience to those bold enough to go and live out their dreams? I guess with the rise in TV, and now streaming, that is largely what we have been conditioned to become - passive spectators of other people's stories.

That's not the only choice you have though.

As every twist and turn in the story of your life unfolds, you get to choose if you will rise to the challenge, heed the call, take up the mantle. What matters to you? Does your character care about a cause? Do you want to adopt stray cats? Are you all about ending extreme poverty? What about helping with domestic violence? Are you spurring others on to achieve their dreams, while watching yours fade away? Do you have a great idea to transform into a revolutionary invention, or business to start or quest to go on? You get to decide what kind of character you will be, and you have great influence over how your story is written.

It is OK to be best supporting actor for a time - we all need our trusty side-kicks - but if you're always in that role, check yourself. You have your own story to tell, your own dreams you want to pursue. If the person who you are playing 2IC to isn't willing to also do the same for you, then it might be time to find a better trusty side-kick.

Don't be afraid to be your own leading character.



7. Having Your Own Story Stops You From Being Victim to Someone Else's Plot Choice


The book begins with him talking to another friend about this idea of story, about working towards something, and the lack of purpose that comes from living a storyless life.

He, his wife and their two teenage kids were living the classic white-picket-fence-suburban-dream life. He worked a lot, so did his wife. They all went to church as a family, but he discovered that his daughter was sneaking out at night to meet an older guy, going out drinking, smoking and cavorting. He had a fast car, was covered in tats, and exuded arrogant coolness. He was every father's worst nightmare. Not necessarily a bad thing for her, but not ideal for a good Christian girl at age 15. These parents were horrified.

“He thought about the story his daughter was living and the role she was playing inside that story. 
He realised he hadn't provided a better role for his daughter. 
He hadn't mapped out a story for his family. 
And so his daughter had chosen another story, 
a story in which she was wanted, even if she was only being used. 
In the absence of a family story, she'd chosen a story in which there was risk and adventure, 
rebellion and independence.”

So what does he do? He talks with his wife and they start creating a story for their family. They go to South America for a volunteering trip and start building houses in underprivileged areas. They all enjoyed it so much, that they go back, again and again and again. As their family is imbued with a sense of purpose, there is no longer a need to lecture and prate at a daughter who is disobeying family rules, because she's realised it herself.

“No girl who plays the role of a hero dates a guy who uses her. 
She knows who she is. She just forgot for a little while.”

For me, grief has been quite a difficult plot point to overcome. There were very nearly times where my story was ended because of someone else's storyline. It is particularly at this time of year grief seems most insurmountable. But even after my brother took his own life, I realised there was only so much wallowing on that that I could do. I still had life. I had no intention of squandering it, and I now - rightly or wrongly - feel like I need to pack in two life's worth of living to compensate for what he missed. 

8. Good Stories Involve Sacrifice



“It wasn't necessary to win for the story to be great, 
it was only necessary to sacrifice everything.”

We know that good stories require conflict and risk, but that's not enough. It is what our characters do with that pain and conflict that really tells the story. If they just take it lying down and accept their new fate, then it's going to be a crappy story.

Living your life on purpose, living your life as if you're the hero of your own story changes how you react. The safe road is no longer the best road. We know that the greater the risk, the greater the reward. But it's not only risk. It's also about sacrifice.

Whether you're Aladdin who has to sacrifice his Genie in order to free him, or you're Obi Wan in Star Wars, sacrificing your life to fight Darth Vader, or Mr Darcy sacrificing your dignity in Pride and Prejudice to get the girl, there's an acknowledgement that in order to get what we really want, we're likely to have to give a lot of ourselves in return.

Which sucks. Sacrifice is crappy, and it feels horrible. It often requires discipline and prolonged periods of withdrawal or going without something.


There's something about humans that means that we don't really appreciate joy, unless it has come with a lot of pain before it. It is one of those strange paradoxes of life where in order to find meaning, there often needs to have been pain or sacrifice involved.

“Here's the truth about telling stories with your life. 
It's going to sound like a great idea, 
and you're going to get excited about it, 
and then when it comes time to do the work, 
you're not going to want to do it. 
It's like that with writing books, and it's like that with life. 
People love to have lived a great story, 
but few people like the work it takes to make it happen. 
But joy costs pain.”

Teachers will understand the sacrifice it takes to become good at teaching, and get your teaching registration. Attaining that teaching registration and creating the discipline needed in myself to lead myself as well as others remains to date the hardest thing I've ever done. Conversely, it is also something that I'm supremely proud of, and despite the bumps along the way, it is one of the core things I look back on very proudly. Teaching is hard at the best of times, and I started in not-the-best-of-circumstances, so to overcome that, to overcome myself in a lot of ways was really rewarding. 

9. Smooth Sailing Does Not A Good Story Make


“Robert McKee says humans naturally seek comfort and stability. 
Without an inciting incident that disrupts their comfort, they won’t enter into a story. 
They have to get fired from their job or be forced to sign up for a marathon. 
A ring has to be purchased. A home has to be sold. 
The character has to jump into the story, into the discomfort and the fear, 
otherwise the story will never happen.”



Much like Bilbo Baggins, so many of us are stuck in our comfortable little lives, with our eyes on the next prize of 'get to Friday, have a sav' or 'Sleep in on Sunday, yaaaas queen' or 'Get the thing done so my boss is off my back', we're blinded by the day-to-day-ness of it all and lose sight of the story.


Or worse, we forget the story, we diminish ourselves to what someone else wants us to have, what's convenient for them.

What a betrayal to yourself!

I've always had an issue with turns of phrase like 'Stay safe', or 'take care'. Safety is important and apparently, I should actively try to not kill the children in my care, but apart from that - you can have safety or you can have a story. If you're focus is on safety, the story is likely to be lame. If your focus is on story, the necessary prerequisite for safety will figure itself out, because you can't finish your story if you're dead. (...or maybe you can, there are quite a few stories that beg to differ - Dead Like Me being one) Stay alive, stay with your story and you'll likely be safe enough.



See, we're left with this dilemma: what do we do with this gift of life? Sequester it in a safe harbour, or sail off into the sunset?

I'm not saying start out as a lonesome novice in a storm. If at all possible take seasoned sailors with you - don't be an idiot - but also know that a story is likely coming for you whether you like it or not, and how epic the tale is entirely depends on how much you embrace it, own it, and author it.

Part of this is you need to stop kneecapping yourself. I, for example, am really good at coming up with brilliant ideas for stories, or bits of poems, or a few scenes from a would-be movie, but I'm rubbish at actually making time to write any of those things down. 'It will never be as good as it sounded in my head when I actually write it out' my inner perfectionist screams. Yea, it probably won't - but that's why writers craft and edit. Create opportunities to set yourself up for risk, for adventure, for success.

10. There is (probably) No Story in Your Comfort Zone


“But the people who took the bus didn't experience the city as we experienced the city. 
The pain made the city more beautiful. 
The story made us different characters than we would have been 
if we had skipped the story and showed up at the ending an easier way.”

You don't have to travel to have a story or an adventure, it's about the mindset, and Ginger Kern eloquently explains here. It's about exploring in your own city, even if you only have a 2km radius to work with at present, it's about always being curious, and open to new possibilities.


We've actually been doing that a lot recently - exploring locally - and we have discovered some gems!

Blessington Park is this sneaky secret garden only about 1km away from us

East Wall has a lovely walk next to Dublin Bay, with a rather different vantage point
than Clontarf across the water

Pretty tree reflections

Shetland ponies, hanging out in a village green by a set of lights out Finglas ways

I talked a big game about getting out of my comfort zone when I lived in New Zealand, claiming that my comfort zone was pretty big. Leaving my job and renovating a house for a year were pretty big, but it's been nothing like the cataclysmic challenge that has been getting used to a new city, new country, new career, new culture all at once. It's really disconcerting living outside of your comfort zone for long periods of time. The cocky confidence which once I swaggered around with is largely gone and I'm now left second guessing myself about basically everything.

At some point soon a new normal will emerge, my cocky confidence will likely regenerate, and as the waves of change grow calmer, the new rut will form and I will once again chaff against the confines of it, and ache for novelty again.


I do not care if you've seen this before - look at it - it is important.

I think getting out of your comfort zone is often falsely conflated with novelty. Getting outside of your comfort zone is about intention. You do not need to go somewhere new or move countries or even necessarily change jobs or cities or friend groups to get out of your comfort zone.



If you'd really like to test yourself and challenge yourself on all fronts at the same time, then by all means move cities or countries, it will do the job. You don't have to though. Even within your current relationship, your current house, your current job, your current situation there are opportunities for you to push the boundaries.

It's about setting the intention. It's about your mindset. It's about getting outside of yourself and thinking about your situation, reflecting, tweaking and challenging yourself.




11. You Have More Agency Than You Think


“You’re right,” he finally said. “You aren’t living a good story.” 
“That’s what I was saying.” 
“I see,” he said. 
“What do I do about that?” 
“You’re a writer. You know what to do.” 
“No, I don’t.” 
Jordan looked at me with his furrowed brow again. 

“You put something on the page,” he said. “Your life is a blank page. You write on it.”


You, and God/ the universe/ Allah/ other higher power, are co-authors in this epic saga of your life. There's a bunch of stuff that you do not get to choose, when and where you were born, what kind of society you were born into, how much money you have, and what your talents, likes and proclivities are. 

There's a bunch of character development and exposition that's already done for you. There will be chapters in your life that you aren't proud of. There will be chapters in your life that were written by others and ones you wish you could erase, but here we are. Unfortunately, this is a film-as-you-write story, and there's no space for editing, the only way forward is a better narrative arc, and plot points. 





There are undoubtedly things that you would change about your story if you could, I think we all have those. Most of us have made peace with those parts because they have shaped us and made us who we are today. Who you are today has a lot more clout, experience and chutzpah than that pretty green young thing you were dealing with 5, 10, 20 years ago. 


But who will you be in another 5, 10, 20 years time?

You have narrative responsibility going forward. Are you going to be a victim of circumstances or gird yourself with purpose and agency, and take on the world? Shit happens, the question is how will you choose to overcome this? Will it make you bitter or better? How will you tell this story to yourself? How will you tell this story to others? How will you move on?

I cannot find it to save my life, but there was a hilarious meme going around about how if someone goes back in time, they have to be really careful because one false step and they could completely alter the course of history. But in our current lives, we do not give ourselves the same belief that we too could completely change the course of our own lives, let alone the world!

You have profound influence over your life, yet so often the language that we use when we speak about ourselves puts us in a victim mindset - I don't have enough time, I'm not smart enough, I could never do that.



Stop creating stories where you are the victim. Become your own hero. 

A particular bugbear of mine is when people say that they do not have enough time. 


You have exactly the same amount of time as everyone else. 


The difference is what you choose to use it for. The difference is intention. I know not everyone's life circumstances are quite so simple and it doesn't always seem like a choice, but it is. 



You choose to weave webs of entrapment for yourself with social obligation and busyness. You choose to go for that walk, or do yoga or apply for that job. You choose who you spend time with. You choose what you do each second of each day from dawn until dusk, even if it's habit or autopilot. Start thinking about it like it is a conscious choice, because it is.  

If we're not questioning the choices, then chances are we're pretty happy with them, or we've numbed ourselves to the consequences of living an unsatisfying story. 




“My uncle told a great story with his life, 
but I think there was such a sadness at his funeral because his story wasn't finished. 
If you aren't telling a good story, nobody thinks you died too soon; 
they just think you died. But my uncle died too soon.”


So the question is: what kind of story are you writing with your life?

Obviously, don't feel like you have to come up with an answer today. Today is a day for thinking, and testing the edges of possibilities. Figuring out what you want. And if it's worthy of being wanted. Figuring out what you like. What makes your heart sing. Or perhaps sitting with the conflict and knowing that this too will pass, plotting and planning what you will do when it does.



Life is too precious with too many brilliant people to meet, wonderful things to see and important things to do to simply be treading water until you die. Have you found a cause to get passionate about? Have you got a book being drafted in your head that needs to actually be put into actual words? (That one's for you, Lauren!) Have you got someone you need to reconcile with, a great love to find, a point to prove, a soapbox to stand on, a battle to win?

What story is already itching to be written with the precious days of your life? Is it pithy and risky and bold? Do you smile when you think about what's next? Are you shit-scared? Is it something that you'll reminisce about when you're on your rocking chair at 100, thinking back over your life, remembering the best bits?



You're much more likely to regret the chances you never took than the ones you did.




So where do you start? Here. Now. Start with giving yourself 5 minutes a day to think about your story - if it's that you already have a great story, then give yourself a pat on the back. If it's that you need to start a new chapter, then think about the setting and action in that chapter. If it is that you need to throw out the current book and just start afresh, then by all means, in the bin it goes. If fear is holding you back, maybe tell it to kindly fuck off. Feel the fear and do it anyway. I find if you're a little bit scared, you're heading in the right direction.

It is about doing life on purpose. It is about the difference between the passive voice and the active voice. Is life happening to you, or are you happening to life?

You even get a bonus English lesson in this - you lucky thing you!

Is it 'I don't have any money', or is it 'That's not what I choose to do with my money?'
Is it 'I never have any time', or is it 'That's just not what I choose to do with my time.'



You will not accidentally find yourself in an awesome story. Nature abhors a vacuum, so if you do not take charge and are at least authoring your reactions to the situations around you, let alone the plot points, it is unlikely to have the ending that you want it to have.

You may not get to choose all the events, but you do get to choose what kind of character you will be. Who do you want to be? How will you respond?

One thing I love about creating a story for yourself is it becomes a bank of evidence of how you can overcome.

Whenever I'm having a moment of self-doubt, I go back to a memory of a time where I did something really really hard and I conquered it. One example of that is when I was working towards my Gold Duke of Edinburgh award, and the final thing I had to get ticked off was a 75km+ walk in 4 days. I've never exactly been a gym bunny, so walking 10km in a day is not too much of a bother, but 20km a day? That's a really long way. It was mid-January, a sweltering 28 degrees in the blazing summer sun, with 30kg packs, we slogged up and down the trails for hours and hours each day. It was a beautiful track, but there were many hills and my pack was heavy. My legs were lead, my heels blistered, the heat dizzying. The first day was 19km, the second 16km, the third 25km and the fourth 16km.

The first day, about 2 hours in, I hit the wall. I sat down on the track, had a cry, and eventually realised there was no way out of this mess but through it. As I slogged on and commanded my body to keep going even though it really wanted to stop, I was consistently surprised by how when my mental barriers had been overcome, then the physical barriers were less of a concern.

This was the hardest physical thing I've ever pushed myself to do, but I did it. I take my hat off to people who think that 20km is a walk in the park and happily run that. But for me, in my normal, that was really hard.

And now, when I'm up against anything else that's really tricky, I remember I've been through physically, and emotionally, harder stuff than this, so the likelihood of me weathering this storm is 100% so far.

You too, are stronger than you think. You are powerful beyond measure. You are in control of a great deal of your life. Work out what you can control, and start narrating your story.

While you're next chilling with your bevvie of choice, have a think about these points to ponder:


  • Who is writing the story of your life?
  • What to do you want?
  • Is it worth wanting?
  • What am I willing to give up to get it?
  • Who do you want to be?
  • What do you need to overcome?
  • When does the next chapter start?


To put this in a broader perspective, currently we're part of a big story - the Covid-19 epic saga. The thing with stories, is that they change the characters, and people come out different, they don't simply slot back into the same life they had before. Countries can also be considered as characters in this scenario, and there will be some that will have radical social, political and economic overhauls after this I think. But from a macro to micro perspective, this is a point of conflict in all of our stories, and you choose whether your character is going to learn something from this.

You can choose to be the actor, or be acted upon. Which will it be?

“The great tragedy of our lives seems to be that we are smart enough to ask the questions of meaning but too dumb to really figure it out.”

Take this as a proverbial kick up the bum - you've had your lounging about, now see about that story. Figure it out before this brief flash-in-the-pan life is over and you spent it wanting a Roomba.





NB: If you have read A Million Miles in A Thousand Years more recently than I have, you'll need to forgive me as I'm going on decade-old memories here.


Extra

Super interesting article about the importance of the stories we tell ourselves.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/08/life-stories-narrative-psychology-redemption-mental-health/400796/

Books:

A Million Miles in A Thousand Years: What I Learned from Editing My Life by Donald Miller

Learned Optimism by Martin Seligman


Movies:

Click

(Everything with an epic story ever)


Friday, 24 April 2020

I Think I've Figured It Out ;)

I grew up in an environment where science was questioned. A lot.

See, my family was part of a reasonably fundamentalist Christian church. I was a third generation Seventh-Day Adventist. Some would call it a cult. It's not. But the cast of Adventist beliefs range from, 'Yes, the Earth really is 6000 years old', to 'The dinosaurs weren't a problem because Adam and Eve were actually 6 times bigger than you or I', to 'Creation is definitely a thing, and definitely happened in a literal 6 days', to 'Evolution is obviously not true because where are the half-men-half-monkeys now?' to 'There's archaeological evidence of the great flood and Noah's Ark story being true!'

All of this is on top of the usual fundamentalist Christian stuff of no sex before marriage, gays are an abomination, prayer really works, God is real and he's watching your every move, thought and action, and obviously there is a heaven or hell after this life, as well as grave predictions about the end of days which will be brought on by natural disasters, war, famine and disease.

Adventism is to Christianity what pop tarts are to toast: extra af. Just cos they both go in the toaster, doesn't make them the same thing. This particular flavour of Christianity denounces drinking, denies dancing, values vegetarians, cautions against caffeine and sermonises on Saturday. They believe in prophecies, particularly from Ellen White, God's anointed. The SDA grew out of the Millerite movement, which followed William Miller. He interpreted that Jesus' second coming would be in 1844. It was not. The church grew exponentially around the world regardless, so it was clearly based on something beyond prophecy and beyond facts. Edit: There are some more details here and here and here, if you want to know more.

There's no evidence for the majority of this stuff. Of course there's no evidence, Lauren. That's where faith comes in, you just have to believe.

Edit: [There is some reasonably compelling evidence for the end of days prophecy that predicted the birth of Jesus, and also predicts the end of days, and the second coming of Jesus in the Book of Daniel.]

Always keen for a good tale, I did devoutly believe Christian stories as truth for a long time. As a Christian, I was ridiculed throughout my time at school by a host of different people for my beliefs and practices. I was an out-and-out loud and proud Jesus Freak for a really long time. Sure, there were always doubts and nagging questions that I just couldn't quite reason away, but these people were my people, their God, my God, and if it was good enough for them, it was good enough for me, I reasoned. Besides, what does it matter if evolution is true or not? It doesn't affect my daily life.

There are many, many things I'm grateful for from my upbringing like learning kindness, caring, meeting many awesome people, going on expeditions, camping and travelling all over the country, and the world. At age 23, I concluded that even if none of the stuff in the bible was objectively true, then living like a Christian - using gratitude, meditation, focusing on the good in others, loving, having mercy, helping the poor, and seeking peace - was still be a better way to live than the alternative.

10 years on, I secretly still really hope a lot of the Bible/prophecy stuff is true. It would be delightful if there was some celestial being who actually gave a shit, but the longer I live, the more evidence I see to the contrary. Even the idea that God's laws are written in men's hearts seems a bit of a stretch given the current climate of selfish, egotistical leaders who are elected by woefully ignorant people. The gap between reality and what I was being asked to believe grew too big and the swirling mess of angst around it couldn't sustain my faith any longer.

This upbringing has left me with a social circle full of lovely, beautiful, joyful souls, but people that are used to believing and buying into some pretty outlandish things.

When you live a life on the fringes of society, there's an element of social rejection that you get used to. You become largely immune to people's ill-opinion of you, because in order to live the way you believe is right, you have to ignore what the vast majority of people think. The fringes contain geniuses and idiots, or just divergent thinkers.

On the fringe, you have your group, and they create stories, rationalities, not only to justify their beliefs, but to justify their lack of belief in what the majority believe. Things like 'Other people are just unthinking sheep' and 'They just haven't discovered the truth yet'.

I remember, as a teenager, actually being amazed when I heard moralistic statements come out of my schoolmates' mouths, having been encouraged to think that we Christians were literally 'holier than thou'. This was one example of the condescension and arrogance that tends to come with the groups on the fringes. The basis of it comes down to 'But we have the truth' and the underlying belief of  'We actually just know better than everyone else'. There is a cognitive bias that reinforces this called illusory superiority.

People default to assuming that they know just that little bit better than everyone else, but more than that, that whatever the government, scientists or what other [pagan] people think, say or believe is, in fact, either super-biased, has a hidden agenda, is part of a conspiracy theory, or is out-and-out wrong.

In extreme circumstances, these people start to broadcast their knowing-better-than-everyone-else, and create a cult-type following, bred on their particular version of 'the Truth'.

My issue is not so much with church-going God-fearing types, but in my anecdotal experience, when people have grown up in this, no longer believe church dogma and then need to find 'replacement' beliefs is where this all gets really fun.

People who believe in quirky things like vampires, Bigfoot, or UFOs are usually a little counter-cultural, and they're OK with being on the fringes rather than in the mainstream. People who believe in only one of these phenomena are usually above average intelligence, findings from Chris Bader and Carson Mencken show in Paranormal America.

Rutger Bregman in his book 'Utopia for Realists', eloquently sums up where I am going with all of this: "A man with convictions is hard to change," but more than that.

"When reality clashes with our deepest convictions, 
we'd rather recalibrate reality than amend our worldview"

He goes on to emphasise that one factor definitely not involved in this is stupidity. "Researchers have shown that intelligent people are more unshakeable in their convictions that anybody. After all, an education gives you tools to defend your opinions. Intelligent people are highly practised in finding arguments, experts, and the Internet has made it easier than ever to be consumers of our own opinions, with another piece of evidence always just a mouse-click away."

Bregman cites another great thinker, Ezra Klein, and adds,

"Smart people don't use their intellect to obtain the correct answer, 
they use it to obtain what they want the answer to be."

My intention here is not to besmirch anyone's intelligence; quite the opposite. I'm fascinated by how people's minds work. Sometimes it can be our own intelligence that is our worst enemy, from thinking there's more to the story when there's not. Equally, sometimes we don't question things enough. It's a case of judgements, and self awareness - learning your own cognitive biases where your thinking is tripping you over.

It's difficult to know in the slough of information we are bombarded with from the mainstream media (MSM), the internet, and others' opinions if anything is actually true or not, particularly during the current chaos.

My wonderings stem from how people get into situations where they are claiming (and actually believing) that 5G is spreading coronavirus and other such bunkum?

A lot of religious folks who have grown up in the faith have had to suspend belief in science, because it has become a narrative of science vs religion, rather than science for explaining what we can and religion for explaining what we can't. As science has advanced, it's become less possible for people to hold both science and religion simultaneously.

When you have a worldview that has been shaped by believing that you have a corner on the truth, and your group are just that little bit smarter than other people, and that what other people believe is ridiculous - despite the evidence - you get a set of people who are susceptible to things like believing - despite the evidence - in a whole lot of weird things. It's not a far leap for those people to become people who believe in conspiracy theories, or counter-cultural thinking.

I would posit that it is at the crossroads of a distrusting worldview, and finding a group that socially accepts them. But let's explore that further...


Why People Reject Objective Truth

Some would argue that there is no such thing as 'objective truth', only relative truth and perception. However, I think we can agree that a natural world exists, we inhabit our bodies, we live on planet Earth, and other such basics. The physical world is difficult to argue about, but our interpretation of the physical world can be vastly different. Take India's worship of cows vs the West's hunger for turning them into burgers for example.

Other objective truths get a little more dicey. This, combined with a mistrust of experts, has created a climate where all opinions are valid, and everyone questions everything.

Some people seem to have a cognitive predisposition to reject authority. (Sometimes I'm one of them.) Additionally, there's been growing mistrust in mass media, government, science, and generally 'the establishment' for some time. A healthy amount of scepticism is important, and not blindly trusting everything anyone says to you is also necessary, but surely there needs to be a balance.

Having corruption after scandal after fuck up exposed time and again, I can see how some could get the idea that governments are working to further themselves and their cronies, rather than the 'of the people, by the people, for the people' ideal we're supposed to be living under. Life experiences where individuals have let you down, or betrayed you, tie into our beliefs in humanity in general. There are a lot of factors on top of your natural personality inclinations.


When Optimism is A Curse

I've noticed that some people seem to reject objective facts because the fact is simply too difficult to carry, to bear for an extended period of time. People who have a strong default to optimism, to need to feel positive and good about life, constantly dismiss some facts as 'negative', preferring to believe that 'everything is going to be fine', or 'it can't/won't be as bad as you're making it out to be.' These are generally the same people at the moment that are complaining about lockdowns being an overreaction.

Usually optimism is an asset, but like everything, taken to an extreme, it can also be a curse. When boundless, unreasonable, unshakeable optimism is unhinged from facts and left to continue rising like a helium balloon, it actually becomes a liability.

Where it gets really dangerous is when you have people that have default emotions that will not allow them to participate in what is 'objectively true' because it would cause them emotional discomfort.

Having to spend days and weeks inside is uncomfortable and inconvenient for everyone, but how you explain it to yourself is quite important. If you know that you're taking one for the team, and you believe the official line of 'this is the most helpful thing you can do right now', then you are basically a hero in pyjamas.

If you are dubious about government at the best of times, a draconian-seeming measure like lockdowns where you're promised 'It's for your own good' is unlikely to fly. To compound that, if you have been financially impacted, you are more likely to want to get out of the current discomfort.  Losing one's income because there's no longer opportunity to make money would certainly be reason for complaint. For some, it is easier to reject the facts, and assume that others have an adverse agenda, than accept that shutting down the economy is the only solution we currently have.

Governments are currently being accused of overreacting, and are becoming a victim of their own success

If these people (super conscious that I'm doing a lot of othering, but obviously none of this applies to me as I'm perfect. ;) ) accept the facts presented by governments and media as unquestionable truth, then they have a choice to make. Deal with these new facts and adjust one's self, or reject new facts and assume the problem is with the facts, and not with self.

The acceptance proves too dark to withstand for some: Live with sadness, panic, fear of getting sick or fear of losing income, uncertainty for the future, and general dread. This constant low mood is too much for some to bear, and they need to find something to be joyful about, at any cost. Anything that impinges upon our (construct of) freedom is going to suck, and so some take this as a personal assault and get all up in arms about their rights. They get angry that their freedom has been taken away, and like a toddlers who's had a broken toy confiscated because they might hurt themselves, they throw a tantrum trying desperately to reclaim their freedom to play with their toy, even though it's broken and they'll take someone's eye out by flinging it around.

I get it. I naturally have a default towards freedom, action, happiness and joy, and it's really hard to sit with the constant anxiety, fear and uncertainty. When I went to uni, the entire place seemed intent on destroying me because there was just depressing statistic after morbid fact, and I became seriously jaded with all this new knowledge. I didn't like it the constant downbuzz. The naive optimism and faith I had in humanity, and the world, was destroyed like a malicious sibling popping a balloon at a birthday party.

That didn't make the knowledge less true. It meant I no longer had the bliss of ignorance.

Unfortunately for optimists, there are loads of depressing things that are true. It is possible to still be joyful and happy in your own world despite those. There are also a lot of really great things that you don't hear about in the MSM all that often such as this article that speaks about 99 amazing things that happened in 2019 and this article that demonstrates in pictures the best and the worst of humanity, and this article that sets forth how the twenty-teens were the best decade in human history because extreme poverty is down to less than 10% of the population, and humans are starting to use less stuff than initially predicted because of technological advances, and concludes with a bunch of super-optimistic predictions about the future.

But you need to be able to hold both of those things simultaneously - the world is both a horrible and a beautiful place all at once. Which is hard and requires a reasonably good understanding of a bunch of different components, and discernment about who is it beautiful for and who it is horrible for, what makes it so, when, and why.




When the world seems to be going into free-fall, and people's livelihoods and normalcy are called into question, holding all of that can be too much for some, and with such incredulous news, it can be difficult to know who to trust. Our new reality seems unreal.



Uncomfortable Facts

This is my working theory:

When you have a worldview based on a mistrust of accepted facts, and then you add 'uncomfortable' facts, there's a particular group of people that reject the facts, not because they are not true, but because their world view cannot accommodate them being true.

The more uncomfortable the facts; the bigger the rejection.

What do I mean by uncomfortable facts? I mean the kind of things that if I accept this as true, it makes my life really uncomfortable. This presents differently in different people.


  • If I accept that the government's safety net for homeless people is insufficient, I'm therefore obliged to do something about it. A very uncomfortable reality for empathetic people. So some then explain this as homeless people are there out of their own poor choices - it's a moral failing, and I'm not obliged to do anything about it. Others give all of their spare change or buy homeless people snacks at the local Londis.
  • If I accept that there's a possibility that Climate Change is a human-made problem, it radically calls into question my way of life, and demands that I will do something concrete about it. This is a very uncomfortable fact for most, so it is easier to reject it than absorb it and be permanently uncomfortable, questioning yourself and your life choices constantly. The alternative is assume that it is either false, or serving someone's political agenda, therefore you're off the hook for any meaningful action.
  • If I accept that I'm not actually in my best physical condition, I can either resign myself to being forever a bit spongy around the middle or I can reject that, assume the choices I've made have led me to this point, and start making better choices with the short amount of life I've been given. Living with the knowledge that the things I want are terrible for me is reasonably uncomfortable information, thus more often than not it is overridden.
  • If I accept that capitalism creates winners and losers, and that I am a winner, but in order to be a winner there need to be more losers, then I have to sit with the uncomfortable fact that there's a system that may in fact require some serious tweaking, rather than me just senselessly participating in it, trying to scramble up the ladder. Alternatively, I can believe that capitalism is the answer to all of life's problems and we should definitely be continuing with this same model going forward despite the obvious problems such as dependence on flaky investors for a stable economy and govt bailouts for massive corporations that should really be managing their companies in different/better ways. 
Knowing that you are part of a problem and living with that information can be quite tricky for some. I've noticed there's four basic types of people in regard to these ideas.

Knowledgeable Dreamers
Some people are unfazed by uncomfortable facts, and happily walk around knowing everything and doing nothing to change the current reality.

Knowledgeable Doers
Some people need to utterly transform their lives when confronted with uncomfortable facts.

Dismissive Dreamers
Others prefer to question or dismiss any uncomfortable facts as a fallacy, opting instead to walk around in blissful ignorance or with woke 'alternative facts'.

Dismissive Doers
Still others seek to actively spread misinformation to counter the uncomfortable facts with comfortable compromises - climate change is caused by solar flares, Australian fires were started by arsonists, vaccines = autism, Earth is flat, Covid-19 is only as bad as the flu etc etc etc. We'll call these people dismissive doers because not only do they believe some amazingly false stuff, they actively promote others believing it too.

So how does this feed into your worldview?


Why Does Your Worldview Matter?




Your world view is made up of your base personality, and some core beliefs. Some of these beliefs were created in the interaction between your personality and your upbringing - you've all heard about the alcoholic who had two sons? One never drank a day in his life, and the other was a full blown alcoholic, and both of them said, 'Well of course, look at my father.'

Your worldview is a prism that you see the world through, scattering the light across a bunch a subjects like 'are humans fundamentally good or evil?', 'do you believe in a spiritual realm?', 'is science or art more important?', or 'do you prize tradition or innovation?'. If you would like to know a little more about your worldview, there's a test you can do here.

Do you see man as the master of the world or as part of the world?

Why does world view matter? It's like seeing the world through glasses, a certain strength of lens particular to you.

Your worldview defines how you see the world


First, it's helpful to know your own worldview. As depicted below, there are a bunch of things that play into your worldview. Experiences, the way you've explained those to yourself, and your emotional due-North form a huge part of that.

Emotional due-North, Lauren?

Yes, your internal emotional compass will always point to something. What is your something?

Default Emotions

See there's these things called default emotions. We all have them, they're largely programmed by the environments we grew up in, and the people we were surrounded by, and the culture we're in. Another huge influencer is the stories we feed ourselves, about ourselves, and the world. Sure, you can experience a bunch of other emotions, but there will be an emotional state that is most comfortable for you to be in.

Everyone has on their own emotional barometer, somewhere where their personality and upbringing leads them to naturally sit. For some, it's naturally angry, for some, naturally joyful, for some naturally melancholy, and for others, naturally blasé. Obviously other things come into that such as personal choice, but people will often create feedback loops in their lives that will become a self-fulfilling prophecy to feel these default emotions.

Example of not-so-happy emotions

Positive feedback loop - my inner teacher really liked this one

If you have a default emotion of joy, then like Pollyanna, you will seek opportunities to feel glad.

If you have a default emotion of righteous indignation, then you will constantly be looking to be outraged and be getting into heated debates with people.

If you default towards anger, then similarly, you are likely to find things in your day that piss you off a little bit. The stories you tell about your day will be ones where things annoyed you.

If you default towards dissatisfaction, then you will always be fault-finding and thinking about how things could be better if x thing changed.

If you default towards feeling powerless, then you will paint yourself as a victim in your stories that you tell yourself and others. You will - consciously or unconsciously - create situations where you can become the victim, so that you get that feeling that is comfortable and normal to your brain.

I bet we all know at least one person who's default is peace at all costs - they will say or do anything to maintain peace. No confrontation is worth the emotional cost of a fight, so they just won't engage.

These pathways in our brain are well worn, and they are comfortable, even if they create mayhem in our relationships and in our lives. They are our default, and not only are they where our brains go most often, we are likely to hang out with others who also have a similar default emotion.

The flipside of default emotions are unbearable feelings - the ones we avoid at all costs.


Unbearable Feelings

There is likely to be a feeling that is simply unbearable for you, and you will do whatever it takes to not feel it.

An unbearable feeling is not just an uncomfortable feeling, it is one that will result in a completely and utterly irrational behaviour in order to not feel that feeling.

An unbearable feeling could be criticism. If we despise being criticised, so we will lash out with words, and blame it on someone else, and storm out.

Some people have uncertainty as an unbearable feeling - they have to be in charge, they have to have a plan, they have to know what's going on. We would colloquially call these people control freaks, but there's usually more to it. If there is oscillation or uncertainty in this person's future, it can result in crippling anxiety, or a violent lash out.

I hate being wrong. It is deeply uncomfortable, but it's not an unbearable feeling for me. I've learned to almost lean into the deep discomfort of it. I now seek out criticism to the point where I do not trust entirely positive feedback.

An unbearable feeling for me is that I am 'too much' for someone - too wacky, too loud, too bold, too edgy, too fat, too opinionated, too slow - and so I will shrink myself down or curtail myself to such a state that I think they can handle me, where I will be just a little bit challenging, instead of entirely too much to bear.

A bigger problem still is being taken for granted, and not appreciated for the effort I've put in. This would probably be most notable in around the house chores, for reasons previously discussed here. I lose my shit, and it takes all the skills in my toolbox to stop my thoughts going from
a) I'm doing more than my fair share
b) I'm being taken advantage of
c) Person is going to take me for granted
d) I will end up being used, abused and discarded

It is often not successful, and that is where I end up.

If you have a person and their unbearable feeling is feeling out-of-control, sad or depressed or isolated, then of course in the current situation, they're likely to baulk.

Our decisions, actions and reactions can be based on not necessarily what we're working towards, but what we're trying to get away from. If we are not aware of them, and willing to do the work to downgrade them to uncomfortable feelings, our unbearable feelings can rule our lives.


So What?

So why do I care? I have been musing a lot about if I even have the right to have opinions about this. Do I even have the right to challenge someone's opinion, worldview or belief system? Shouldn't we just let them believe what they want?

Normally, I'm all about letting people believe whatever and enjoying the idiosyncratic theatre of people rationalising the world to themselves, but when people die as a direct result of this folly, that is where I draw the line.

(I'm lying: my line was way back at alternative facts, gas-lighting, propaganda, spreading hate and wilfully misrepresenting the truth.)

How does our culture create this mistrust of experts, an avoidance of sadness, and foster freedom at any cost? One of the ways is the stories we glorify: the renegade hero.


The Renegade Hero

Our culture is saturated with stories about people who knew better than everyone else - we glorify them and make heroes out of them.

1984 is a story of tyrannical authoritarian government but it's also about being an individual when you're not allowed to be an individual, and the danger of critical thinking to big governments. While the story is a cautionary tale about how terrible government can be, it is also a celebration of the rebel to dares to go against a government and remember how things actually happened, despite newspeak saying the opposite.

Iron Man is an exceptional engineer/physicist/billionaire playboy and nobody can tell him what to do. Literally nobody - he won't listen - and he's an arrogant wanker by most standards. But he's a sexy billionaire, so is somehow entrusted with diplomatic relations, peace keeping, and other military and government operations.

Sherlock Holmes is smarter than everyone else, and always finds the real answer, despite the dunces that are the police trying their darnedest.

Dexter who goes around systematically killing cretins because he knows better than the authorities, and he's there to serve 'real' justice.

Batman doesn't work through the channels of the company that he owns, but rather as a vigilante who works in the shadows to save the people because the police are incompetent and unworthy of the tax dollars that pay them.

These stories are successful because they resonate with something in us that would like to believe that we are just that little bit better than everyone else, a little bit smarter, that we've found a life hack, and we are going to find a way to save the day, because we've got the edge on everyone else. (Kind of like how I think I've figured out what makes these people tick...) They also tap into the general frustration that bureaucracy is designed to do things cheaply, not efficiently, therefore government should be avoided and we should have individual freedom at all costs.

Our favourite story is the guy who came out of nowhere with no study, no training, no experience and defeated all the experts. That's who Trump is, that's why he's loved - because of what he's not, not what he is. He is the underdog politician that's there to take on the Establishment, and that is the narrative that he milks! (It's not really true, he's just part of a different type of oligarchic establishment, but that's another adventure for another time...)

Some people genuinely are a little bit smarter, but it is generally only in one or two areas, and those are usually quite niche. Remember the Dunning Kruger effect we spoke of here? This definitely applies when thinking you're really good at a thing, just check yourself on this - are you an expert? Really? Or that thing that that other person is doing - it couldn't be that hard could it? Actually, it could.

The vast majority of us grossly overestimate our intelligence due to how little we do know about a subject, falsely assuming that that thing must be really simple, or that job really easy. Thus, the trust in experts erodes from our own lack of understanding about the subject.



These people that buy into the 'I am better than everyone else myth', the 'I am the exception to the rule' myth, do so because our cultural stories are replete with glorifying those people. They then look for these patterns in their lives, and go, yea, 100% that could be me! (I'm working on not being this person, wish me luck.)

This confidence - warranted or not - exudes from them, and everyone else around them either rolls their eyes, or heartily believes it.

We've created a society where it is necessary to believe a bit of your own bullshit about how great you are - that seems to be the only way to succeed. Your CV has to be glowing to get an interview. Your interview has to be cutting edge, and emanate confidence, in order to get a job. There is no room for self-doubt, and therefore no need for self-reflection. We have created a system where in order to pay their bills, people HAVE to believe they're the bee's knees.

The unintended consequences of these stories, and people subconsciously lapping them up, taking them to be truisms, is that people then drag those stories into real life. They don't trust the government, because of conspiracy theory x y and z. They don't trust science because they're serving political agenda p q r. They don't trust the police because they're just the enforcers of the untrustworthy government, but they have self-aggrandised to the point where they, and their sources, and opinions are infallible, beyond reproach.

"When reality clashes with our deepest convictions, 
we'd rather recalibrate reality than amend our worldview"

Obviously the reverse can also be true, and you can trust too much in the government, and police can certainly be dickheads, and there are a lot of people who do self-reflect, and are well aware of their limitations. These seem to be the exception rather than the rule, though.

Like, with most things, either extreme is dangerous. One results in a nation that blindly trusts people like Hitler, and the other end results in people believing that the CDC and the government have an agenda, and the WHO is just trying to sell everyone vaccines to a made-up disease. Both are dangerous, and can result in a lot of needless deaths.

Imagine if Climate-Change deniers accepted that climate change was a reality? They would then be shouldered with the responsibility of doing something about it.

If the current lockdown protesters accepted that maybe governments actually had the interests of their citizens at heart when shutting down the economy, then they would have to find something to quietly amuse themselves with rather than ruminate on propaganda and 'alternative facts'.

Perhaps I'm wrong, it's a constant possibility, but from my limited anecdotal evidence, this seems to be the common thread. The facts do not mesh with their world view, and if accepted, some people would short circuit and self-combust. The leap to get from their entrenched worldview to one where they can entertain, debate or accept these ideas is simply too large.



Our values form our beliefs, which form our emotions, which form our thoughts, which form our behaviour. Unless something leaps in and challenges us at a belief level, in a palatable way, in a moment when we're already doubting our belief system, that is likely to just be rejected.




This worldview has been slowly incrementally formed over a long period of time, layered like bedrock by parents upon friend, decision upon debate, youtube clip upon random blog, upon acceptance of this, upon rejection of that, to form the person you are now.

Much like an archaeologist digging up things buried in bedrock, I am fascinated by the rubbish that has surfaced with the recent crises, and I think it requires a lot of study, but prior to that, a lot of brushing the dirt off and close inspection under a microscope.



These people that are willing to believe literally anything other than what is touted by MSM, because they don't want to fall victim to their hidden agenda, seem to me to just fall victim to a different hidden agenda, rather than coming up with any original thoughts or solutions.

I just don't think it's likely that EVERYTHING in the MSM is made up...
The truth is in there somewhere between the spin, the special interests, and the facts.

We have had our fun with relativism and giggled at everyone from Anti-Vaxxers to Pastafarians, but the fun is now over, and this ridiculousness is costing lives.


Are you a pastafarian?
I think we all know someone who has participated in a conspiracy theory or three. Sometimes there are sneaky cover ups and we need the Erin Brocoviches of this world to uncover them. I'm all for truth, but test your truth - does it hold up to reason, common sense, fact checking, peer review?

I'm still a little bit convinced 9/11 was an inside job - but that became a whole lot harder to believe after going to Ground Zero in New York.

If you have these people in your immediate, or extended family, or in your friend group, how do you engage positively or help? How - when lives are literally at stake, and what people believe could be the difference between life and death - do you try and talk the conspiracy theorists down?

If refuting doesn't work, and reasoning doesn't work, what options are left? Leaving them to the consequences of their actions, and letting history prove them right/wrong?

I assume the 'correct' answer is unconditional acceptance, separating the problem and the person, and slow incremental disproving in a spray-and-walk-away type fashion. This seems tedious, ineffectual, and presently insufficient.

Maybe I haven't got it as figure out as I thought I did.

Today, I'm left with more questions than answers. Please share your answers with me, if you have some.

Updated to include some more facts about Adventists - 19/5/2020

Extra Reading

http://www.theohnine.com/home/2017/12/13/unbearable-feelings

https://www.people-press.org/2019/07/22/trust-and-distrust-in-america/

https://jamigold.com/2014/04/story-themes-whats-your-worldview/

Test to see what your world view is - Mine is integrated and anti-traditional lol.
https://www.culturalevolution.org/worldview-questionnaire/

Super-interesting article about people no longer trusting experts
https://fs.blog/2019/02/distrust-intellectual-authority/

When a relative falls down a conspiracy theory rabbit hole https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/424112/when-a-relative-falls-down-a-conspiracy-theory-rabbit-hole

Movie to watch: Idiocracy

Books: Educated by Tara Westover

Utopia for Realists by Rutger Bregman